I Am Working With A Family - 1487 Words

Question 1: In this scenario, I am working with a family in the hospital setting. The patient is a 7 year-old male who is hospitalized due to complications with cystic fibrosis and also has a diagnosis of Down Syndrome. Present in the family structure is the patient and both biological parents, who are college graduates and have substantial employment. From my previous observations, I am aware that the patient enjoys positive attention, such as praise, nonverbal attention, playing games, or reading books, from adults, but also frequently displays non-compliance with requests from adults. Another important observation to note is that the patient is only able to follow simple 1 and 2-step commands and cannot speak in full sentences. In the healthcare setting, there are many experiences that may lead to problematic behaviors in children, but in a situation where a child also has a developmental disability these problematic behaviors can be more intense and more difficult to tame. An antecedent is what happens immediately before a problematic behavior, such as a demand, transition, time of day, specific request being denied, and so forth. An antecedent that might lead to problematic behavior in the hospital for this particular child could be seen in the following example; the nursing staff entered the patient’s room to start an IV without assessing developmental age/abilities and gave the patient a 3-step command to keep his arm still, not wiggle his body, and listen or talk toShow MoreRelatedI Am Working As A Family Health Nurse And Counseling A Married Couple Essay1054 Words   |  5 PagesWhen caring for families who need genetic counseling, it’s essential that the nurse understands and considers the family’s values, background, beliefs and behaviors. This information is valuable when setting mutual goals, developing care plans and choosing interventions (Andrews and Boyle, 2016). In this post I will imagine that I am working as a family health nurse and counseling a married couple who are seeking my advice because they are both carriers for Huntington’s disease. As a nurse it’sRead MoreReturning to School Essay858 Words   |  4 Pageshas been a dream for a long time. I am starting out a little late, at 45 years old, but I have finally found my passion, working in education. Since the age of thirteen, I have been working multiple jobs day and night, only to still be below the poverty line; stuck in survival mode for so long now that I need to have a permanent positive change that will help me accomplish more than I ever have. The reason for me going back to school is to get certified so I may become a teacher. Our low incomeRead MoreWhy I D eserve This Scholarship712 Words   |  3 Pages I should be chosen for this scholarship because I am a positive, hard working student who is very involved in my school and my community, and has future goals. I believe that I hold all those characteristics, plus many more. School is very important to me. I show this by working hard in my classes and being involved in extracurricular activities. I have received all A’s throughout my high school years and my teachers can always depend on me. At school I am a member of Fellowship of ChristianRead MorePersonal Note On Personal Skills1395 Words   |  6 Pagespersonal skills I have and use in everyday life and work is that I can multitask, I’m dependable, hardworking, productive, resourceful, and able to adapt easily to different environments. I have always had a, â€Å"get things done as quickly and accurately as possible†, type of personality. Some of my interests are learning new things, creating things- like crafts, repurposing, painting, etc., and being outside. I like to figure things out and solve problems. My weaknesses are that I am impatient, notRead MoreEssay On Why I Want To Be An Associate893 Words   |  4 Pages I would like to thank you for giving me the opportunity to apply for an associate position! I am interested because I want to take my experience with Ascend to a higher level. After completing enjoyed my experience as a new member, I feel that Ascend’s atmosphere really resonated with my personality, and I think this is a great organization where I would want to develop my leadership skills. I can learn many things outside of the classroom, and it would help me get the most out of my college experienceRead MoreMy Journey As A Service Coordinator995 Words   |  4 Pagescoaching, referrals, and resources needed so that the family and children involved in EI are able to achieve their outcomes and successfully function once discharged out of Early Intervention. Although I am only beginning my journey as a service coordinator, I have been assigned to work with over 40 families of different incomes, races, ethnicities, and cultures. As a service coordinator I find the most intrin sic value when working for families of oppressed populations. In my own personal experienceRead MoreMy Plans And Aspirations For Completing A Graduate Education923 Words   |  4 Pagesthis personal statement I will address my plans and aspirations for completing a graduate education. I believe that an adequate college education is a necessity in today’s society. There are numerous resources and opportunities available to those who choose to seek a college education. I am committed to continuing my education to achieve my career goal of becoming a family nurse practitioner. Several members of my family are in the healthcare field, as both doctors and nurses. I have had the privilegeRead MoreWhen It Comes To My Reasoning For Entering The Teaching1009 Words   |  5 Pagesfor entering the teaching profession, I think it stems from my own experiences within American schools. I have had profound teachers who have inspired and motivated me to continue to work towards preserving the ideas and beliefs that strengthen education. On the other hand, I have had subpar teachers who have influenced me to teach for alternate reasons. They have shown me that reform and change are needed to bring our education system back to the top, and I would love nothing more than to play aRead MoreWhat Makes Me Who I Am?847 Words   |  4 Pagesthroughout the stages of life, and I am no different than any other individual in that department. The first thing that comes to mind when I think of what makes me who I am is my family. They were all I had when I was born and they’ll probably be all I have when I’m buried six feet underground. I was born into a family with two older brothers (that were ten and seven years older than me), and two loving parents. Being the youngest and having two older brothers I think has impacted me the most. HavingRead MoreMy Field Placement At The Puerto Rican Family Institute Clinic Essay1391 Words   |  6 PagesI am currently doing my field placement at the Puerto Rican Family Institute clinic in Brooklyn, NY. The mission statement for the organization is, â€Å"to enhance the functioning and self-sufficiency of diverse marginalized communities and prevent family disintegration.† I am currently doing individual, family, couples, and group psychotherapy at the outpatient clinic. The clinic is in a lower socioeconomic area in Bushwick, that is currently in the process of gentrification. The program that I work

The Code Of Ethics And Values - 902 Words

As a social work undergraduate, we have several queries regarding why it is so important to follow the NASW code of Ethics and values that relate to human diversity, with regard for the worth and dignity of all persons, as applied to a specific case where we are delivering social work. It is very essential to recognize the five core values of social work, service, social justice, dignity and worth of the person, importance of human relationships, and integrity and competence on our occupation of social work. Today, we have chosen two areas and situations of how we are going to deal with our biases and our challenges while working as social workers, by employing the NASW code of Ethics and values that relate to human diversity, with regard for the worth and dignity of all persons. To begin with, as a person, I always feel it is very challenging for me to go out and work with different groups of people who speak different languages, who practice different religions, whose beliefs and ideology are different from mine. It is my biggest fear that I may be unable to fit in with a group, and not be liked by them, because they are different from me. On the other hand, it’s also exciting that I am learning and getting exposed to these new cultures, and these new people, and these new languages, which helps me to grow and be the person I want to be in my life. To be specific, I might have complications working with people of color, particularly black/African-American. This has to doShow MoreRelatedThe Code Of Ethics And Values1086 Words   |  5 Pages Each individual has a code of ethics which helps to establish morals. Morals play an important part when it comes to determining what is right and wrong. You should also have core values. I think the most important value to have is integrity. Integrity means to be honest in everything you do and to have high morals. I will be honest, sincere, and reliable. Another important value to have is to be caring. Each and every day, I will be considerate and help those that need it. Being caring means havingRead MoreValues And Code Of Ethics1222 Words   |  5 Pagesher own set of values. A personal code of ethics by which feels he or she should abide throughout life. When one decides to enter the field of social work for their profession, there is a new list of values and code of ethics he or sh e must adopt. These are guidelines set by the National Association of Social Workers in the NASW Code of Ethics. Considering each person is different and therefore has different values he or she feels are important, each individual’s personal values could be congruentRead MoreEthics The Code Of Values And Moral Principles2156 Words   |  9 PagesWhat is ethics? Ethics a philosophical term originating from Greek word â€Å"ethos† meaning custom or character. It is concerned with describing and prescribing moral requirements and behaviors, which suggests that there are acceptable and unacceptable ways of behaving that serve as a function of philosophical principles (Minkes, Small, Chatterjee, 1999). Ethical behavior is defined as behavior which is morally accepted as â€Å"good† and â€Å"right† as opposed to â€Å"bad† or â€Å"wrong† in a given situation (SimsRead MoreCode Of Ethics : Nursing Values And Ethical Responsibilities1602 Wo rds   |  7 PagesI. CODE OF ETHICS IN NURSING There are seven primary fundamental values in the code of ethics for registered Nurses These values are entitled as â€Å"Nursing values and Ethical Responsibilities.† (Centennial Edition, 2008) ï  ¶ Nursing Values and Ethical Responsibilities 1) Providing Care Nurses should be able to provide safe, skilled and proficient, solicitous care to the patients. The relation between the nurse and the patient. 2) Promoting Health and Well-Being Nurses should be enable to work withRead MorePersonal Code Of Ethics And System Of Moral Values1063 Words   |  5 Pagesshowing him how it is to be a leader. Integrity is expected of all health professionals in the work place. A leader demonstrates integrity by being consistently truthful, honest, and reliable. A nurse leader adheres to both a personal code of ethics and system of moral values. A leader has a positive attitude that helps to motivate others to join in the purpose. Leaders have initiative and take the first step to make it happen. Leaders have lots of energy and enthusiasm which enables them to get thingsRead MoreThe New Zealand Counselling : Code Of Ethics And Their Core Values1643 Words   |  7 PagesEthics Essay Counselling This essay will outline and discuss four ethical principles included in the New Zealand Counselling: Code of Ethics (NZAC), and their core values. Two ethical dilemmas will also be applied to a case study. Finally, the essay will address three avenues of complaint the client could possibly pursue. For the objective of this essay I will be working as a counsellor for the Blakely family. Specifically, I am assisting Darren, 40 (father) and his child Ciaran, 13 with theirRead MoreNursing Code Of Ethics, Personal And Societal Values, And The Legal Aspects Of The Nursing1251 Words   |  6 Pagesindividuals (Haugh Mildon, 2005). In this research paper, I will consider two case studies from the perspective of the nursing code of ethics, personal and societal values, and the legal aspects and responsibilities of the nurse. The Nursing Code of Ethics According to the American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements (2015), the code â€Å"establishes the ethical standard for the profession and provides a guide for nurses to use in ethical analysis and decision-making†Read MoreCode of ethics serves as the moral compass that directs and guides the integrity, values, and1500 Words   |  6 PagesCode of ethics serves as the moral compass that directs and guides the integrity, values, and beliefs of an organization. A code of ethics clarifies to employees what the company stands for and its expectations for employee conduct (Daft, 2013). A well-written code is a true commitment to responsible business practices in that it outlines specific procedures to handle ethical failures. Within the research enterprise, the code of ethics ensures that research projects involving human subjects areRead MoreProfessional Ethics and Values1020 Words   |  5 PagesRunning head: PROFESSIONAL VALUES AND ETHICS Professional Values and Ethics University of Phoenix Professional Values and Ethics What is the difference between values and ethics? Values are rules by which people make decisions about what is right versus wrong; good versus bad and what one should or should not do. The definition of values according to Dictionary.com is â€Å"the ideals, customs, institutions, etc., of a societyRead MoreCode of Ethics for Computer Professionals1134 Words   |  4 PagesMost professions have codes of ethics and for the same reasons computer professionals need a code of ethics. Professions that have been in existence for many more years than the information profession have had time to recognise their ethical responsibilities. In the information field it can be more difficult to immediately recognise who is affected by the actions of an individual or organisation. This does not mean that information professionals have no moral responsibilities. It is common across

Deepwater Horizon

Question: Write an essay on Deepwater Horizon. Answer: On the 20th of April 2010, an explosion and a huge fire were declared in the oil rig Deepwater Horizon. This accident was considered as the largest maritime disaster oil spill in the US history because, aside from the death of eleven crews, its economic and environmental impacts were considerable. Furthermore, the BP financial damages caused by this accident were particularly considerable. In the London Stock Exchange, the company shares loosed on June 25, 2010 nearly 7% and fell to its lowest level since 14 years, while 50% of the its market capitalization was lost on early July 2010. The companys reputation has also dramatically collapsed particularly in the U.S.A. Before the completion of sealing of the oil well, as the spill has progressed without a resolution, BP was awarded the grade the lowest grade E, in the Covalence multinationals reputation ranking. The PRWeek/OnePolls survey conducted about one month after the accident showed that the public feels that BP has not done enough to stop the leak. One year after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬ ¢l2th Annual Harris Interactive U.S. Reputation Quotient (RQ) Surveyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ revealed that BP was second from last with a score of 49.82 and that BP was still perceived by Americans as one of the companies with the worst corporate reputation (Harris Interactive, 2011). BP was also facing, by mid-June 2010, remarkable calls for boycott of its products by a Facebook group called à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬ ¢Boycott BPà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ and numbering about 640,000 fans. Also, a fake BP Twitter account calledwas made by an anonymous activist and started sending out messages about the Gulf oil spill to Twitter. By the end of May 2010, had 190,035 followers while the BP account had only 18, 826 followers. At last, BP was facing thousands claims and lawsuits from many actors such as fishers, hotels, restaurants as well as NGOs like the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) and other animal protection and conservation organizations. To deal with the spill oil as well as the reputation and financial losses, BP mobilized substantial means and expended a great deal of effort, but crisis experts opinions differed on whether BP has successfully or unsuccessfully managed this crisis. However, many models and theories associated with crisis management can be used as a sound theoretical framework to assess BP crisis management of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Referring to the three-phase model, the most widely used model in the crisis management field, the purpose of this paper is to examine how BP managed the Deepwater Horizon spill oil. Such an investigation will help us to evaluate BP crisis management of this disaster, but will also give an empirical evidence to some ideas and propositions suggested by many crisis management researchers, not yet empirically validated or validated only through laboratory experiments. Method To assess how BP managed the Deepwater Horizon disaster, secondary data have been collected from various trustworthy sources, mainly newspapers, magazines, crisis experts blogs and BP sustainability annual reports. The collected data was analyzed through Content Analysis by means of a grid drawn from our theoretical framework. The grid was compartmentalized mainly into three categories. The first one relates to the pre-crisis phase and was divided into three sub-categories named BP CSR and crisis history, BP crisis prevention and BP preparation to the crisis. The second category relates to the response and reputation repair and behavioral intentions. The third category relates to the post-crisis phase and lists all actions made by BP after the complete killing of the well. Results The results of our case study will take the form of a record of all actions made by BP before, during and after the disaster. 3.1 BP Management of the Pre-Crisis Phase 3.1.1 The BP CSR and Crisis History Prior to the disaster, the social and environmental image of BP was paradoxical. The company was sometimes perceived as an environmentally committed company and sometimes as a polluting and irresponsible company. For several years, the group has specifically tried to differentiate itself from its competitors by displaying a greater environmental awareness. From 2000, the group adopted a new name (Beyond Petroleum instead of British Petroleum) and adopted a new green-white-and-yellow sunburst logo, spending more than$ 200 million in an extensive advertising and public relations campaign. Thanks to this, the BP brand awareness jumped from 4 % to 67 % between 2000 and 2007, the company image was considered as the most environmentally friendly image in comparison with companies operating in the oil sector (according to a 2007 customer survey), has been praised many times a model of proactive and credible corporate social responsibility and its advertising and public relations campaign won the Gold Award from the American Marketing Association. BP has also positioned its self as a company fighting the climate change by promoting the renewable energy activities (including biofuels, hydrogen, solar and wind power), and was ranked as the leader in a 2006 report analyzing the Climate Change Strategies of the top 100 global companies published by the Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies (CERES). BP was also among pioneer companies that begun to publish an annual sustainability and social responsibility report. The BP CSR history has also a dark side. Indeed, the group was familiar with disasters and scandals and has a long history of safety negligence particularly in the United States (De Wolf and Mejri, 2013). The Deepwater Horizon was not in fact the unique BP accident. The first known accident happened in December 1965 and caused the death of thirteen crew when the BP oil rig Sea Gem collapsed while it was being moved. On March 23, 2005, fifteen workers have been killed and more than 170 others have been injured when the BPs refinery exploded and caught fire in Texas City. The company was subject to lawsuits from the victims families and was charged with criminal violations of federal environmental laws. One year later, an oil spill in Alaska caused extensive pipeline corrosion. The company also paid about $ 20 million as environmental fines. Furthermore, BP was many times cited as the worst or among the worst companies operating in USA because of some environmental and/or social impacts of its activities. BP was cited in 1991 by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as the most polluting company in the US based on its toxic release data. It was also considered by CorpWatch as one of the ten worst corporations of 2000 (Mokhiber and Weissman, 2001). Mother Jones Magazine, an investigative journal, named BP as one of the ten worst corporations in both 2001 and 2005 based on its environmental and human rights records. In 2004, The Texas Public Interest Research Group reported that the company was number one in accidents in USA since 3,565 accidents occurred in its U.S. chemical plants and refineries between the period 1990 and 2004, making. Elder (2005) said that BPs operations have the worst safety records of any oil company operating in USA. BP is also considered as one of the biggest spenders on lobbying among companies of the oil and gas industry. Also, BP was suspected to spent about $625 million between 2004 and 2010 just to represent its interests in Washington and nearly $16 million in 2009 to lobby to block attempts to regulate stricter safety by the US Congress. 3.1.2 Crisis Prevention Succession of BP accidents demonstrates that the group was never concerned with prevention and safety. Almost all the investigations reports following the BP disasters revealed that the company had almost no prevention system and neglected security/safety warnings. After the 2005 explosion at the BPs Texas City refinery, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration fined BP a record of $87 million for neglecting to correct safety violations. Only a year later, BP was fined $20 million in criminal penalties after prosecutors said the company had neglected corroding pipelines that caused the Alaskan BP oil spill. The Congressional Investigations on energy and commerce following the Deepwater horizon Spill revealed that BP had no contingency plans for catastrophic loss of well control and that BP lacked planning, oversight, testing and maintenance of blowout preventer which failure allowed a large volume of gas to overwhelm the rig and caused the explosion. The preliminary BPs internal investigations realized one month after the Gulf oil spill also revealed that several warning signs of trouble were ignored and pointed to a series of equipment failures. In addition, some experts and journalists claimed that BP made a series of money-saving shortcuts in days before the accident, which dramatically increased the danger of a blowout and that, worse still, the company neglected security standards on continuing to drill in spite of warnings of gas leak. It should be particularly noted that, while BP is considered and awarded as an environmental responsible company, the French social rating agency Vigeo reviewed, before the accident, the BP rating. The company was considered as the worst energy company in terms of preventing and controlling of pollution accident risks. On the basis of this criterion, Vigeo scored BP before the accident 26/100 (below the industry average which is equal to 31/100), while the leader Repsol collected a score of 61/100 (Ben Seddik, 2010). At last, crisis management experts said that failures of BP prevention and control system was expected because of the budget cuts since the year 2009 (particularly the alternative energy budget) imposed by the former BP CEO, who also shut down BP alternative energy headquarters in London and accepted the resignation of its clean energy boss. 3.1.3 Preparation to the Crisis It is clear that BP was not prepared to deal with such an accident. Besides, Former BP CEO Tony Hayward admitted in his interview to Money Program on BBC 2 that BPs contingency plans were inadequateà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ, that BP was not preparedà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ for the Gulf oil disaster and was making it up day to dayà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ in the early stages. Tony Hayward also admitted that BP was not prepared to deal with the intense media scrutiny over the Gulf oil disasterà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ and that he felt he was demonized and vilifiedà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ. Nearly one month after the disaster, the Wall Street Journal reported that Hayward admitted that the oil giant had not the technology available to stop the leak. He also said in hindsight, it was probably true that BP should have done more to prepare for such an emergencyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ. In addition, the investigations conducted by Congressional committee on energy and commerce concluded that BP was not prepared for a catastrophic loss of well control. Nevertheless, BP has successfully established strong relations with some NGOs thanks to its considerable donations that reached prior the crisis nearly $10 million in cash over the years. For example, the BP donations to the Conservation International which reached $2 million over the years allowing to the company to be BP partner on a number of projects. Also, the Nature Conservancy listed BP as one of its business partners and even gave it a seat on its International Leadership Council but unfortunately after the Deepwater Horizon disaster, some of its members begun to questioning about this partnership and called to review it. 3.2 BP Management of the Response Phase After the Deepwater Horizon blowout, BP has mobilized equipment and resources and has made significant efforts to stem the oil spill and to completely kill the well. During five months, BP engineers tried a number of techniques to slow or to stop the oil leaking but all these attempts failed. BP engineers firstly attempted to close the blowout preventer valves on April 28. On May 8, they tried to cover the well with a containment box, and they tried the Top Kill technique on May 26 to close the well. They successfully stopped the flow of oil on July 15, and completely killed the well on September 19, 2010. However, while the BP engineers were fighting for plugging the leaking well, BP managers continued fighting for repairing the company reputation and the public perception that BP is not enough competent to manage this crisis. As recommended by Coombs (2007b), we separated this response phase into two phases: the initial response and the reputation repair and behavioral intentions. BP entirely failed to manage the initial response of the disaster and committed many flagrant mistakes. First, BP was accused of being slow to acknowledge the problem initially and of did not respond quickly enough. The company took four days to realize that the well itself was leaking. The company was also slow to express concern, compassion and full apology to victims which are most immediately affected by the spill. Second, when the accident occurs, BP has intentionally underestimated the extent of the spill. The company estimated that only 1,000 barrels (159 000 litres) were actually daily spewing into the Gulf, but quickly revised it upward to 5,000 barrels (795 000 litres). Actually, by the end of June, some scientists evaluated the daily oil leak at 60.000 barrels (9540000 litres). Third, the BP former CEO Tony Hayward as the company spokesman, made a series of mistakes while communicating about the crisis. Indeed, instead of expressing its compassion towards the victims, the former CEO initially took to lightly and even minimized its severity considering that its environmental impact would likely be very modest and that it is relatively tiny in comparison with the big size of the ocean. As a consequence, Tony Hayward has become the most hated man in the United States and was replaced by Bob Dudley on October 2010. Fourth, BP tried (by all the means) to limit or delay the flow of information to the public. The access to planes carrying media were refused and sometimes forbidden to many media reporters and the few reporters that were allowed to access, were accompanied by a BP representative. The company also included in workers contracts a clause prohibiting them and their deckhands from making news releases, marketing presentation or any other public statement. Fifth, BP was suspected of covering up the oil by trucking in sand. The company denied the events and argued that at no time has clean sand been used to cover or bury oil or oiled sand and storms that have passed through the area have deposited sand on the beach and eroded it again exposing oil buried by sediments brought in by the weather. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that BP successfully used its official website (BP.com), to regularly provide information to the public about the clean-up efforts of the oil spill as well as the efforts to compensate victims of the disaster. 3.2.2 Reputation Repair and Behavioral Intentions In this phase, a company have normally to repair the reputation, to reduce negative affect and to prevent negative behavioral intentions. To repair reputation damages, BP launched immediately after the accident, a vast public relations campaign. BP began running apologetic BP ads in early June, showing Hayward apologizing for the disaster and taking full responsibility for cleaning up the spill in the Gulf. The company also launched a print ads campaign in US newspapers like The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, USA Today and The Washington Post. This ads campaign was widely criticized by many stakeholders and even by the President Barack OBAMA, who considered that the money should have been spent on clean-up efforts and on compensating victims. BP was also very present in the major social networks (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Flicker) and spent nearly $l Million a month between Google AdWords and YouTube advertising and purchase a number of search terms in order to direct internet users search queries about the Gulf oil spill to the BP site where clean-up efforts are exposed. In order to reassure its primary stakeholders that it consider of high priority (shareholders, investors as well as other partners particularly in Russia and Azerbaijan), BPs former CEO flew to Mideast early July as the BP stock hit its lowest point since the mid-1990s and after the BP decision of selling assets. During these visits, the BPs former CEO held talks with sovereign wealth funds in Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar, as well as in Singapore, in order to find a partner who might help BP to avoid the threat of a hostile takeover offer from its closest competitors. As expected, these visits reassured many BP and generated some enthusiasm in the market for BP shares. To remedy the loss of reputation due to the BP spokesperson failures, the company announced on July 27, that it would change its CEO Tony Hayward in October 2010, by the American CEO Robert Dudley. According to some experts, such a decision would certainly please a lot of Americans and contribute to repair the BP image. Following a meeting with the President Barack OBAMA, BP announced that an agreement was reached to create a $20 billion claims fund over the next three and a half years on the following basis: BP will initially make payments of $3 billion in Q3 of 2010 and $2 billion in Q4 of 2010. These will be followed by a payment of $1.25 billion per quarter until a total of $20 billion has been paid in (BP, 2010 b). In addition, BP announced on August 17, that it would provide $52 million to federal and state health organizations to fund behavioral health support and outreach programs across the US Gulf Coast region. At last, BP tricked many photos (through photoshop tools) and posted them on its Web site as news photos from the Gulf oil spill response effort. A few days later, being widely denounced and criticized by communication experts as well as the public opinion, BP officially acknowledged the facts and promised to stop this practice. 3.3 BP Management of the Post-Crisis Phase In the Deepwater Horizon case, the post-crisis phase began once the well was completely killed on September 19, 2010. However, due to the considerable damages caused by the accident, this recovery phase is expected to continue for several years. Ever since, many decisions and actions were made. To cover the costs, BP decided to divest assets with a total value of $ 38 billion between 2010 and the end of 2013. Until the end of March 2012, BP had sold $ 23 billion of assets. Since early July 2010, BP has sold $7 billion assets (in the Permian Basin, Canada and Egypt) to the firm Apache. In 2011, BP sold its Wytch Farm terminal fields to Perenco for $ 610 million. On March 2012, BP agreed to sell for $ 400 million to oil and gas company Perenco a number of platforms off the coast of Yorkshire and a terminal at Dimlington. A few days before killing the well, BP published its own investigations report into the incident. BP claimed that its engineers, contractor Halliburton and rig operator Transocean share the blame for the complex and interlinked series of mechanical failures, human judgments, engineering design, operational implementation and team interfaces that caused the accident. Its former CEO said that there was a lack of rigor and quality of oversight of contractorsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ, that a series of complex events, rather than a single mistake or failureà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ led to the accident and that it would be surprising if the industry does not look afresh at the relationship with contractorsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ. This BP internal report was widely criticized by experts who considered that it does nothing more than spread the blame, as well as by BP partners Transocean and Halliburton. Transocean responded by describing the report as self-serving while Halliburton said that the BP report c ontained substantial errors. On the other hand, BP has successfully convinced its three other partners on the well (Anadarko, Mitsui and Co. Ltd. and Weatherford International Ltd.) to settle its claims related to the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Anadarko agreed to pay BP $4 billion (less than the $6.1 billion that BP had claimed), Mitsui agreed to pay $1.06 billion (less than the $2.14 billion that BP had billed it for its alleged share of clean-up costs) and Weatherford International Ltd. announced that it would provide $75 million to BP to contribute to the Gulf Coast recovery fund. BP also launched lawsuit against Halliburton, Transocean and Cameron and is seeking at least $40 billion from them. BP considers that maintenance by Transocean was inadequate as was their safety and training protocols, that Halliburton was responsible for cementing or sealing off the well and that Cameron International Corp was responsible for designing and maintaining the blow-out preventer which failed to contain the oil spill. Nearly one year after the accident, BP published its first sustainability report after the disaster. At the beginning, in the CEO letter, the Chairman Bob Dudley acknowledged that the company was sorry for what happened, promised improvements and stated that safety has become their number one priority. Besides, the chairman used nine times the word safe which demonstrates the importance of the issue safety for the new BP. the report does not say how the disaster happened and how much damage was actually done to the environment, the economy and the people. It mainly described how BP is changing. The company said it is forming a Safety and Operational Risk function that has its own expert staff embedded in BPs operating units (including exploration projects and refineries) report directly to the companys incoming chief executive officer and that has authority to intervene in all aspects of BPs technical activities. As for the other changes, the company stated that it has reviewed its Risk management system, has reorganized its upstream business into three divisions exploration, developments and production with a centralization of the drilling wells activity into a single organization, has connected the individual values/behaviors and the BP code of conduct, has aligned employee performance and reward with the performance management system, has reviewed how it works with contractors and other industry partners, has repositioned the technology to meet the 2lst-century energy demand safely and responsibly and has lastly initiated a review into its approach to the management of relationships with significant non-operated joint venture operators and partners (BP, 2010 a). This first post-Deepwater Horizon CSR report was considered by many experts as a purely greenwashing and was then widely criticized. In fact, BP said it couldnt include the Gulf spill, because there has been no accurate determination of its size and refused to list any figures from the accident. The company argued that no accurate determination can be made or reported until further information is collected and the analysis, such as the condition of the blowout preventer, is completed and that we have not included any emissions from the Deepwater Horizon incident and the response effort due to our reluctance to report data that have such a high degree of uncertaintyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ. In addition, the report showed that 2010 had the lowest spillage by comparing BPs oil spill levels for 2006, 2008, and 2010 (1.7 million litters in 2010, as opposed to 2.2 and 3.4 million in the earlier years). As for supporting the communities affected by the disaster, BP accepted to settle lawsuits (for $7.8 billion) brought against the company by businesses and individuals and to pay about to them. The estimated compensation includes provisions for $2.3 billion to bolster the regions seafood industry and $105 million to improve available health care in the impacted communities. BP also agreed to provide periodic medical consultations for the next 21 years for those with spill-related health complaints. Experts recalled that Exxon Mobil agreed to pay damages to settle the Alaska spill oil twenty years later and considered that this agreement is for BP a significant step to support the affected communities and to repair its reputation damages. Most recently, BP began through workshops with its influential stakeholders around the world (in London, Washington DC, New Orleans and Rio de Janeiro), to initiate a dialogue to find out what they expect from BPs sustainability reporting. More than 40 stakeholders (including representatives of non-governmental organizations and community groups as well as academics, policymakers and investors) took part in these workshops which aimed to give BP a clear brief about what stakeholders want to know about its culture, plans, policies, processes and performance. The company already included a summary of the workshops findings in its 2011 sustainability report. Lastly, BP has used a specialist market intelligence search engine to identify trends in public and stakeholder opinion about BP and to evaluate their potential to affect the companys reputation. A meta-analysis was also provided of all the recent stakeholder research and dialogue BP had carried out or commissioned. Discussion The analysis of BP crisis management of the Deepwater Horizon disaster shows mainly that there are many failures at managing the three phases of a crisis. Through the analysis of BP environmental strategy before the crisis occurs, it turned out that it was just a Greenwashing, that safety was not a priority to BP, to the point that it has never envisaged an emergency plan, was not sufficiently prepared to such a catastrophic situation and did not make enough efforts to avoid crises. Worse still, only few days before the accident, BP neglected serious warnings and even cut corners on Deepwater Horizon safety. When the crisis occurred, the BP initial response totally failed. The company was too slow, tried to blame third parties and abdicated responsibility while it would express concern for the victims and take its responsibility and reassure all the stakeholders. BP even aggravated its reputation damages when it censured or delayed the information flow and refused to cooperate with the media. Even after the crisis, BP continues to conceal important information about the real damages of the spill oil, disseminated only information that can contribute to repair its reputation and continues to blame its partners. Besides, through the succession of accidents and scandals, it seems that BP has never believed that it could learn from such crisis. In the light of this case study, at least four lessons can be learnt. The first lesson refers to the strong connection between CSR and crisis management. This BP case study is in fact a strong reminder that companies should nowadays sincerely embrace the principles of social and environmental responsibility and have to consider themselves responsible for more than bottom-line results. Crisis management literature showed that in time of crisis, CSR acted as a company insurance policy (Klein and Dawar, 2004) and that the companys history has an instrumental effect on how it will be perceived when a crisis occurs (Maresh and Williams,2010). It is noteworthy that prior to the crisis, BP had tried to build up an image of legitimacy and trustworthiness, but this does not help it during the disaster. This is due mainly to the lack of credibility of its discourse. This consequently demonstrates the dangers of the greenwashing strategy and the propagandist discourse. Carrying a continuous spe ech of socially responsible company increases, apparently, stakeholders expectations in times of crisis, and this in turn generates more pressures on it. In addition, it must be kept in mind that CSR aims, among other things, to protect the interests of all the stakeholders. Preventing and being prepared for a crisis should then be viewed as part of the company social responsibility. If BP had set up a prevention and crisis management system and if BP and its former CEO were well prepared to manage such event, this crisis could have been avoided or would have been resolved sooner or at least damages would have been greatly reduced. Crises are in fact, often unpredictable, so it is important to establish a crisis prevention system to reduce the likelihood of, and anticipate the occurrence of a risk and acts as quickly and as efficiently as possible in case of occurrence of a crisis. The second lesson relates to the importance of initial response when a crisis occurs. In this phase, BP was neither quick, nor accurate and consistent. BP failed then to manage the initial response phase which caused to the company a remarkable reputation loss. As many companies, BP seems to ignore that communication during the first hours of a crisis can have remarkable implications for the image of a company and a brand (Dawar and Pillutla, 2000), that almost 80% of a crisis management consists of communication and that much of a crisis lies not in its reality, but in its perception. This case study, demonstrates that initial actions made by a company in times of crisis, significantly influence public opinion about the crisis and an organizations handling of the event (Hale et al, 2005) More notably, as predicted by Ulman (2001), BP initial crisis communication was largely focused on legal concerns and resulted in denials of responsibility, minimization of the extent of damages and lack of useful information to stakeholders. Referring to Coombs (2007b), in the initial response phase, BP should have provided information and should have taken actions that might help affected people to cope psychologically and physically with the crisis. For BP it was better to take its responsibility, to reassure victims and specifically to begin by expressing concern for the victims of the crisis which could reduce the negativity effect of the crisis. BP also ignored that when a crisis occurs, crisis leaders, specifically spokesperson have a central role in building and sustaining organizations trust and credibility among stakeholders (Schoenberg, 2005) and that in times of crisis, leaders and therefore spokesperson must be able to communicate with all stakeholders and should be exceptional communicators (Seijts, 2004). Because of being not prepared to a crisis, former BP CEO has significantly contributed to BP loss of reputation with his arrogance, negligence and famous statements. This case study provides then empirical evidence on the importance of the initial actions in times of crisis as a significant factor influencing the public opinion about the crisis and an organizations handling of the event (Hale et al., 2005). he third lesson refers to the relationship between the company and its stakeholders. This case study is in fact a strong reminder that a company should no longer operate independently of their stakeholders. It has rather to interact and to build strong relationship with them, not only during and after a crisis, but also prior to a crisis. Prior to crisis, the company can benefit from its interaction with its stakeholders by implementing standards of corporate responsibility that meet their expectations (Heath, 1997), by understanding how stakeholders might react to a crisis, what resources and information they might have available to assist in the management of a crisis, how they might be impacted by the crisis, and how they might exert a negative impact on the organizations ability to manage the crisis (Mitroff et al., 1996). In addition, companies that build alliances and achieve coordination with their stakeholders prior to a crisis will experience greater success outcomes and less failure outcomes in crisis management than will those organizations lacking such alliances (Pearson and Clair, 1998). Even, if the interaction with stakeholders cannot help an organization avert every crisis, it can at least play an important role in how the organization resolves a crisis (Ulmer, 2001). Otherwise, if a company doesnt have strong relationship with its stakeholders, they may withdraw their support during a crisis, prolong the effects of a crisis and even intensify the threat associated with the event (Ulmer and Sellnow, 2000). In addition, Stakeholders want to feel informed, safe and connected when a crisis occurs (Seijts, 2004). So, open, timely and trustworthy reporting, as well as regular dialog and communication with all stakeholders should be maintained in times of crisis. The company should also be honest about what it knows and does not know, which would give it far more credibility. Specifically, the company must not ignore the central role of media during the crisis, because the majority of the information stakeholders collect about organizations is mainly derived from the news media; therefore, media coverage is an important feature of reputation management (Carrol and McCombs, 2003). Seeger (2006: 240) said that rather than viewing the media as a liability in a crisis situation, risk and crisis communicators should engage the media, through open and honest communication, and use the media as a strategic resource to aid in managing the crisisà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬â€œ. Lastly, after a crisis, a company should collect information from a wide range of stakeholders including external stakeholders and has to continue to work in close dialog with them in order to reduce feeling of anger and blame, to reassure them, to understand how they perceive and feel about it after the crisis and to involve them in effort to repair reputation damages (Coombs, 2010). The fourth and last lesson is that company should learn from a crisis. The succession of BP accidents demonstrate that nothing has been learned from its previous accidents. From the beginning of the crisis and until today, BP often gets defensive position and denies its whole responsibility. Ideally, companies should consider the end of every crisis as the beginning of the preparation step for the next one (Jaques, 2007). Recovery is not just getting back to work, but it is asking, what we have learned to prevent this happening again and what could we have done differently. Surely, crisis inevitably creates severe harm, but it also has the potential to serve as a renewing force for the organization (Seeger et al., 2005). Companies which can survive after disasters are more prepared for future challenges (Penrose, 2000). Unfortunately, this is often not the case. At last, companies would not learn only from their own experiences, they must consider the critical events and experiences of other companies and try to learn from them (Baum and Dahlin, 2007). Besides, the BP disaster has served as a lesson to its closest competitors. Four of the worlds largest oil companies (Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Shell and ConocoPhillips) agreed to form a $1 Billion joint venture, called the Marine Well Containment Company, to create a rapid-response system to capture and contain oil spills in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico. The created new company aims to develop response plan and technology that will be able to act into 24 hours and to capture and contain up to 100,000 barrels of oil from deep-water rigs in the case of an accident. Conclusion This paper aims mainly to examine how BP managed the Deepwater Horizon spill oil, the worst environmental disaster the US has faced. It reveals that because of many failures as well as its negative history, BP was fighting two crises at the same time, the big spill oil and the deep loss of its reputation. In spite of being purely exploratory, this case study has allowed to give some empirical evidence to some propositions - as yet theoretical, and to highlight lessons learned from the management of the disaster. It mainly reminds; first that CSR and crisis management are connected concepts. Second, that in time of crisis, the initial response has major repercussions on company image and reputation. Third, that company should consider stakeholders as effective partners when managing a crisis, and fourth that crisis has the potential to serve as a renewing force for the organization. The organization should then learn from crisis to prevent next crises and to be prepared for them. As for the research perspectives, it is strongly recommended to deepen the examination of the effects of reputations repair strategies on the company reputation depending on a crisis type, because it can effectively help crisis managers to prevent, to prepare for and to deal with crisis. At last, it should be noted that this case study is one of the few researches whose results are not derived from a laboratory experimental research. Nevertheless, adopting a qualitative approach using only secondary data and giving our own interpretations to some events, does not allow to draw generalizations from the results of this study. Besides, that has never been the intention. References Baum, J. A., Dahlin, K. B. (2007). Aspiration performance and railroads patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organization Science, 18(3), 368-385. B Carroll, C. E., McCombs, M. (2003). Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public's images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 36-46. Coombs, W. T. (2010). Parameters for crisis communication. The handbook of crisis communication, 17-53. Dawar, N., Pillutla, M. M. (2000). Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Jou

Religion and medical issues coursework Essay Example Essay Example

Religion and medical issues coursework Essay Example Paper Religion and medical issues coursework Essay Introduction Religion and medical issues coursework (a)(i) Describe the treatments available to help infertile couples to have children. There are various treatments available to help infertile couples have children. A first treatment that is available is surrogacy. Surrogacy is where a woman agrees to become pregnant and deliver a child for a different person. There are two types of surrogacy, host surrogacy and gestational surrogacy. The first, host surrogacy, is where the embryo of the couple who want the child is implanted into the surrogate mother. This treatment can be used when the mother still has ovaries that are producing eggs, but she cannot for some reason have the child herself. The second treatment, gestational surrogacy, is where the surrogate mother is the biological mother. The sperm of the father is then injected into the woman’s vagina, via a syringe and a catheter. This method can be used if the mother is infertile, or if the father has sperm that has limited mobility, and so needs assistance to get to the egg. Surrogate mothers are not paid for their role as a ‘mother’; however their expenses are paid (up to à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½10,000), meaning that they do not end up with extra bills to pay, such as paying for maternity clothing. Religion and medical issues coursework Essay Body Paragraphs AID and AIH are treatments in which the sperm of the male donor or husband is artificially inseminated into the woman who wants to conceive a child. These methods can be used if the woman does not have a partner who is fertilising. Artificial insemination by husband (AIH) is a procedure in which the husband donates his sperm. This is then frozen until the woman next ovulates, where it is then either injected slowly into the vagina of the woman, or injected into the uterus using a catheter. AIH can be used to overcome potential problems such as thickening of female mucus, premature ejaculation or anatomical abnormalities. Artificial insemination by donor (AID) is a process in which, instead of the husband providing the sperm, a donor provides it. After the sperm sample has been collected, it is then frozen and injected into the woman’s vagina when she next ovulates. Due to the law being changed in 2005, once the AID child reaches the age of 18, they can now contact the sperm ba nk and request details of the sperm donor. This is putting many men off because of the risk of being contacted by a child 18 years after they have donated the sperm. A fourth treatment that is used to help infertile couples have children is IVF. In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) is a process in which the egg cells are fertilised by the sperm outside of the womb. After the egg has been fertilised, the embryo(s) are then implanted back into the woman’s uterus, and the pregnancy continues much like if the baby had been natural conceived. IVF is often used in cases of tubal damage, endometriosis, low sperm count and mucus hostility. As there are usually 2-5 embryos implanted into the woman, there is also an increased risk of multiple births, although this has risk has been stemmed to an extent as there is now a law which prevents women from having more than a certain number of embryos implanted at once. When the couples IVF treatment has finished, they may have some spare embryos that were not used during the treatment. If they decided that they do not want to freeze them for future use, or destroy them they can donate them. Embryos that were not used for IVF treatment and were donated by the couple can anonymously donate them to other couples for use in their treatment. a)(ii) Explain Christian attitudes, and the attitudes of ONE other religion, to these treatments. Christians agree with infertility treatments because they feel that it is good to use technology to provide couples with the happiness of having children. However, they also say that the egg and the sperm should be from the husband and wife, ie using In-Vitro Fertilisation or Artificial Insemination by Husband, as using a donor (AID or Surrogacy) means that the couple are not bonded by the fact that they created a child together and so, may not be as loving a relationship. Christians also believe that discarded embryos are foetus’ and so destruction of these is justified by the intentions of the couple – to produce a child. Finally, Christians agree with infertility treatments because they believe that it encourages people to adopt, something which is heavily encouraged in the Christian community. On the other hand, Christians may disagree with infertility treatments, and firstly this is due to the fact that when IVF is used, several eggs are fertilised and so many of these are thrown away and discarded, which in the Roman Catholic church is considered to be the same as abortion. Also, Artificial Insemination and also Surrogacy require male masturbation and this is considered to be a sin in the Roman Catholic Church. Furthermore, Christians believe that children have a right to know who their parents are and this is prevented in AID and Surrogacy, therefore it is frowned upon especially in the Roman Catholic and Church of England denominations. Finally, Christians may disagree with infertility treatments as it can prevent a sex act, and this is considered to be a n integral part of pregnancy. Pope Pius XII of the Roman Catholic Church once described a donor being used to aid infertility as ‘mechanical adultery’ and this is because they believe that the mother and father should know each other and be married before pregnancy should be attempted. The Roman Catholic Church also believes that infertility treatments where spare embryos are created cannot be allowed. However, the Church of England has a different attitude to the Roman Catholics on the status of the embryo. Lord Habgood, (a former Anglican Archbishop of York,) said: – ‘At this earliest stage of their existence, embryos do not have the moral value of persons. They are to be treated with respect, but essentially they are no different from the product of early miscarriages.’ Muslims agree with infertility treatments as they believe that it is just using medicine to bring family life, which all Muslims are expected to have. Muslims also agree with infer tility as long as the egg and the sperm are from the mother and father (using AIH and IVF, which is the same as the Christians believe). They also believe that discarded embryos are foetus, and so their use is justified by the good intentions of the mother and father – not to kill them, but to create life. In contrast to this, Muslims disagree with some other infertility treatments. Islamic lawyers have banned all other types of embryo technology (AID and Surrogacy), because they deny the child’s right to know its parents. This, in the eyes of Muslims, is equivalent to adoption and adultery (zina) which is strictly banned in Islam. Marcia Inhorn, a medical anthropologist from the University of Michigan, said that ‘an adopted child makes relatively little sense makes in the Islamic world’ and that an adopted child is ‘really like a stranger in your family; you can love it and treat it very well and the Qur’an encourages this,’ she said, ‘but the scriptures don’t allow legal adoption as it is practiced in the West. The child keeps its given name and does not inherit anything from the family’. (a)(iii) Explain why religious people may have problems with transplant surgery. Some Christian’s do not agree with transplant surgery. One first reason for this, is that they believe transplanting organs from the dead to the living is ‘playing God’ which is seen as a sin by many Christians. Christians also do not agree with paying for organs, as this is viewed as being exploiting the poor which is banned in the Bible. Some Christians also believe that donating living organs is a way of ‘loving your neighbour’ and therefore acceptable, however another group of Christians say that this is completely wrong and unjustifiable. This other group of Christians also believe that transplant surgery ignores the sanctity of life and also is equivalent to ‘playing God’, whic h is a sin. Furthermore, they also agree with many of the non-religious arguments against transplant surgery such as that it is very expensive, uses a lot of medical skill and money for a few people to benefit. Moreover, it raises moral questions concerning the actual time of someone’s death and whether surgeons try to keep someone alive, when their organs could be used to save somebody else. In addition to this, some Christians also believe that transplant surgery encourages the sale of organs from Less Economically Developed Countries (LEDC’s) to wealthier countries such as Britain, and so forces the issue of whether it is right for someone to sell their kidney if the alternative is starvation. Immoral private workers have been happy to collaborate in this abuse of the poor, which is banned in the Bible. Most Muslims are against transplant surgery, and as a consequence do not carry donor cards. Muslims believe that transplanting from one human to another is against w hat Allah would want. Another reason why Muslims are against transplant surgery is because the Shari’ah teaches that nothing should be removed from the body after death, so organs should not be taken from Muslims who have died. This is because they believe that after death, they will go to heaven but in order to do this they need to have their body intact. Furthermore, they are also opposed to having a post mortem to determine the cause of death if it is needed, as they feel that their bodies may not be accepted into the next life if they are not left untouched. The Qur’an teaches that only God has the right to give and take life, and so transplanting organs is ‘playing God’ which is the greatest sin – shirk – in Islam. Also, Muslims believe in the sanctity of life, so life belongs to God. However, some Muslims say that transplants from a living donor (if the donor is a close relative) are acceptable. They agree as Muslim lawyers say it is OK , and the Muslim Law council of the United Kingdom say that Muslims can carry donor cards and have transplants. Also, Islam aims to do good in the world and help people, so this group of Muslims may argue that this is the reason why these people carry donor cards and have transplants. We will write a custom essay sample on Religion and medical issues coursework Essay Example specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Religion and medical issues coursework Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Religion and medical issues coursework Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer